We Stand With Tina— February 8th Nationwide Event
Tina Peters remains wrongfully imprisoned due to politically motivated charges brought against her in Colorado. This is not just a state case—federal intervention is not only possible but necessary. Under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) and the Fourteenth Amendment (Section 1, Clause 2), the state of Colorado has no jurisdiction over this case. Furthermore, a recent executive order, Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government, provides the legal framework to challenge this egregious conviction and secure justice for Tina Peters.
Tina Peters, as a duly elected county clerk, took an oath to uphold the United States Constitution. She fulfilled her federal duty to preserve election records, acting in full compliance with federal law. Because of this, she is protected under the Supremacy Clause, making Colorado’s prosecution and sentencing wholly unconstitutional. The state has blatantly overstepped its authority, and its verdict and punishment must be nullified.
The recent executive order directly confronts the abuse of power by government agencies and their unjust persecution of political opponents. It mandates a full review of cases where individuals have been targeted for exposing corruption or defending constitutional principles. The case of Tina Peters is one of the most blatant examples of such tyranny.
Tina Peters courageously exposed the vulnerabilities in electronic voting systems, proving that these systems were connected to the internet and that critical election records had been erased. Instead of being honored for her integrity and dedication to election security, she was persecuted, falsely charged with identity theft, and sentenced to an outrageous nine-year prison term. This punishment was never about justice—it was a calculated move to silence a truth-teller and instill fear in others who might stand up against corruption.
This executive order, in conjunction with the supremacy clause, serves as a crucial tool to undo the injustice inflicted upon whistleblowers like Tina Peters. If her case is rightfully transferred to the federal courts, as required under the Supremacy Clause, a presidential pardon could and should be granted. This action would not only correct the grave injustice inflicted upon Tina Peters but also affirm that no state has the authority to prosecute individuals for fulfilling their constitutional obligations.
Tina Peters' case is a battle for justice, integrity, and the fundamental rights of every American. Political persecution cannot be allowed to stand. The time for action is now—her case must be overturned, and those responsible for this abuse of power must be held accountable. Justice must prevail, and the principle of protecting those who expose corruption must be upheld at the highest levels of government.
